COMMUNITY
 Letters to Editor
Send a letter
BACKSTAGE
 The Magazine
ESPN Radio


 ESPN.com
NFL

NBA

BASEBALL

NHL

M COLLEGE BB

W COLLEGE BB

GOLF ONLINE

COLLEGE FB

SOCCER

EXTREME SPORTS


Al Morganti
Friday, November 3
Playoff expansion will be a hot topic this summer



There are no concrete plans to expand the current number of teams which qualify for the playoffs. But according to several general managers and league personnel, there is a chance the number of teams which make the playoffs may expand from 16 to 20 teams by next spring.

"I think the number of teams which qualify for the playoffs is going to be a hot issue over the summer," said Vancouver general manager Brian Burke. "I think the conversation is going to begin when the league has meetings during the Stanley Cup finals, and I think it will continue from there."

Based on the 1999-2000 final standings, the Canucks finished 10th in the Western Conference. If the league had expanded the playoff format to 20 teams, the Canucks would have made the playoffs.

So, you would think Burke would be in favor, right? Wrong.

"With two more teams coming in (Minnesota and Columbus), I think we've got it about right with about half the teams (16 out of 30) making the playoffs. In my opinion, there has to be some emphasis and reward for playing well in the regular season.

"I'm not going to be like one of those guys who only looks at things in terms of my team right now. Sure, if the league expanded (to 20) we'd be in better shape.

"But I think that is short-sighted. You can't just keep adding levels to help teams financially. Eventually, you've got to deal with the real problem, and the real problem is fiscal responsibility. We have to address that issue, and making changes such as more teams in the playoffs doesn't make sense to me."

However, Burke readily admits that he doesn't know if he will be on the same page as his owner -- and ultimately, that is the level where changes will be made.

"We talked about it in a very informal manner at the last general managers' meetings," said Bryan Murray, the Florida Panthers GM who is likely to sign a contract extension early next week.

"It was just a general discussion, not even on the agenda at the GM meetings," said Murray, but he would not be surprised if it came up in a more formal manner. "I think there is a feelings on the part of some people that they'd like to see it.

"The feeling I got is let's leave it alone for right now. But there are a number of GMs who think we should increase to 20, whether it's right or wrong, I don't know."

Once again, I think you've got a case of fiscal policy on one side, and competitive aspects on the other. The subject was broached earlier this season, and I think Glen Sather (Edmonton GM) was the main reason. I think Glen carries enough weight that it will be taken seriously.
Islanders GM Mike Milbury

Murray did make a point that the ability of a team to make the playoffs is the deciding factor in many jobs. "Even though the number of teams has increased, and the number of teams that don't make it every year is many more, the viewpoint is still is that if you get knocked out in the first round, you're terrible. And if you don't make the playoffs, you are doubly terrible."

It amounts to a time warp in which there is still a perception that "everybody" gets in the playoffs, and if you don't get in the team is woeful. The fact of the matter is that in the golden age of the six team league, 66 percent of the teams made the playoffs (four of six), and after the absorption of the WHA in 1979 it was 16 of 21 teams.

That 16 has remained the same, despite adding a dozen more teams by next season.

How would it work with 20 teams? According to one scenario, the top six teams in each conference get a bye, and the final four play a best-of-five in a preliminary round.

After that, it would be back to 16 and a tourney just as it is right now.

"If we did say we want to go forward and add, we'd probably get ripped right now, so I would think for the next year or two, we would leave it as it is," Murray said. "But there will be a battle, because there are a number of teams that feel otherwise."

Another GM from a team which might benefit from an increase in playoff teams is Mike Milbury of the New York Islanders. Even at 20, it would be a stretch for the Isles, but they are a young, improving team -- and a team which is likely to increase it's budget by 100 per cent under new ownership, a boost which would at least bring them near the middle of pack.

Still, Milbury does not think adding more playoff teams is the right answer.

"Once again, I think you've got a case of fiscal policy on one side, and competitive aspects on the other," said Milbury. "The subject was broached earlier this season, and I think Glen Sather (Edmonton GM) was the main reason. I think Glen carries enough weight that it will be taken seriously.

"I can see the reasons why some teams would be for it, but the financial benefit would not be enough to convince me."

It might not even turn into a battle of teams. In the new NHL, the governors appear more than willing to take their lead from Gary Bettman at the league headquarters. As one Western Conference GM stated; "Why are you asking me? The general manager's power has evaporated. Those decisions are way above our heads."

Stay tuned this summer for what could be a boost in the playoff pool. Or at least the groundwork to get it done in the future.

Al Morganti covers the NHL for ESPN.

  ESPN INSIDER
Copyright 1995-2000 ESPN/Starwave Partners d/b/a ESPN Internet Ventures. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form. ESPN.com Privacy Policy. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service.